On October 1, 86 BC, Roman historian, politician Gaius Sallustius Crispus was born. Sallust is the earliest known Roman historian with surviving works to his name, of which we have Catiline‘s War, The Jugurthine War, and the Histories (of which only fragments survive). The Bellum Catiline, Sallust‘s first published work, contains the history of the memorable year 63 and the story of Catiline’s Conspiracy. Back in school I already made the acquaintance of Sallust with his account of Catiline’s Conspiracy soon after Cicero‘s book. While Cicero‘s report had the much better beginning – “Quo usque tandem abutere patientia nostra, Catilina (For how long, Catiline, will you continue to waste our patience…)”, for me Sallust‘s account was much better comprehensible, since he had used a much more direct language and less fine bonmots [1,2].
Sallust was probably born in Amiternum in Central Italy, also the exact date of his birth is more or less , while 86 BC is widely used. Sallust’s family was Sabine and probably belonged to the local aristocracy. They belonged to the equites and had a full Roman citizenship, but Sallust was the only member known to have served in the Roman Senate. Thus, he embarked on a political career as a novus homo (“new man”); that is, he was not born into the ruling class, which was an accident that influenced both the content and tone of his historical judgments. Only little is known of Sallust’s early career, but he probably gained some military experience, perhaps in the east in the years from 70 to 60 BC. His first political office, which he held in 52, was that of a tribune of the plebs. The office, originally designed to represent the lower classes, by Sallust’s time had developed into one of the most powerful magistracies. The evidence that Sallust held a quaestorship, an administrative office in finance, sometimes dated about 55, is unreliable.
From the beginning of his public career, Sallust operated as a decided partisan of Julius Caesar , to whom he owed such political advancement as he attained. Because of electoral disturbances in 53 BC, there were no regular government officials other than the tribunes. The year opened in violence that led to the murder of Clodius Pulcher, a notorious demagogue and candidate for the praetorship, by a gang led by Titus Annius Milo, a candidate for consul. In the trial that followed, Cicero defended Milo, while Sallust and his fellow tribunes harangued the people in speeches attacking Cicero. In 50 BC, the censor Appius Claudius Pulcher removed him from the Senate on the grounds of gross immorality (probably really because of his opposition to Milo and Cicero). In the following year, perhaps through Caesar’s influence, he was reinstated. In the late summer 47 BC a group of soldiers rebelled near Rome, demanding their discharge and payment for service. Sallust as praetor designatus was sent to persuade the soldiers with several other senators, but the rebels killed two senators, while Sallust narrowly escaped death.
In 46 BC, he served as a praetor and accompanied Caesar in his African campaign, which ended in the decisive defeat of the remains of the Pompeian war party at Thapsus. Sallust did not participate in military operations directly, but he commanded several ships and organized supply through the Kerkennah Islands. As a reward for his services, Sallust gained appointment as governor of the province of Africa Nova. Upon returning to Rome, Sallust was accused of extortion and of plundering his province, but through Caesar’s intervention he was never brought to trial according to the “Invective Against Sallust,” as reported by Dio Cassius. After the death of Caesar in 44 BC, Sallust then purchased and began laying out in great splendour the famous gardens on the Quirinal known as the Horti Sallustiani or Gardens of Sallust. These gardens would later belong to the emperors. Sallust then retired from public life and devoted himself to historical literature, and further developed his Gardens, upon which he spent much of his accumulated wealth. Sallust died in 35 BC, leaving his house and gardens to his sister’s grandson. These afterward became the favorite resort of Nero, Nerva, and other Roman emperors. The gardens remained an imperial resort until they were sacked in 410 AD by the Goths under Alaric, who entered the city at the gates of the Horti Sallustiani.
His first monograph, Bellum Catilinae (43–42 BC; Catiline’s War), deals with corruption in Roman politics by tracing the conspiracy of Catiline, a ruthlessly ambitious patrician who had attempted to seize power in 63 BC after the suspicions of his fellow nobles and the growing mistrust of the people prevented him from attaining it legally.[1,3] In Sallust’s view, Catiline’s crime and the danger he presented were unprecedented. While he inveighs against Catiline’s depraved character and vicious actions, he does not fail to state that the man had many noble traits, indeed all that a Roman man needed to succeed. Sallust describes the course of the conspiracy and the measures taken by the Senate and Cicero, who was then consul.
Sallust’s Bellum Jugurthinum (41–40 BC; The Jugurthine War) is a brief but picturesque account of the war against Jugurtha in Numidia from c. 112 BC to 105 BC. There, he explored in greater detail the origins of party struggles that arose in Rome when war broke out against Jugurtha, the wily Numidian prince, who bribed Roman senators and generals alike. The true value of this monograph lies in the introduction of Marius and Sulla to the Roman political scene and the beginning of their rivalry. Sallust’s time as governor of Africa Nova ought to have let the author develop a solid geographical and ethnographical background to the war.
Sallust’s last work was a history in five books, Historiarum Libri Quinque, embracing the important period between Sulla’s death, 78 BC, and Cicero’s praetorship in 67 BC. Of this, unfortunately, we cannot judge, as only four speeches and two letters remain.
Sallust’s style differs from the writings of his contemporaries — Caesar and especially Cicero. It is characterized by brevity and by the use of rare words and turns of phrase. As a result, his works are very far from the conversational Latin of his time. Sallust’s narratives were enlivened with speeches, character sketches, and digressions, and, by skillfully blending archaism and innovation. This picturesqueness, vigor, and intensity of Sallust’s style were greatly admired by his countrymen.
At yovisto you can learn more about the times of Sallust and his political oponent Cicero in the talk of Mary An Gledon on ‘Politics as Vocation in Cicero and Burke‘.
References and Further Reading:
-  Quo usque tandem, Calilina – Cicero and the Catilinarian Conspiracy, yovisto Blog, Oct 21, 2013.
-  Marcus Tullius Cicero – a Homo Novus, yovisto blog, Jan 3, 2015.
-  Sallust – Roman Historian, at Britannica Online
-  Veni, vidi, vici – according to Iulius Caesar, yovisto Blog, Aug 2, 2012.
-  “Introduction”, Sallust’s Catiline, ed. Jared W. Scudder, Allyn & Bacon: Boston, 1900. via The Society for Ancient Languages
-  Sallust, from biographybase
-  Works by Sallust at project Gutenberg